Posts Tagged ‘buy to let mortgage lenders’

Postive Solutions BTL Surgery Sessions

September 13th, 2011

Recently, I came off a fixed rate mortgage deal only to find out I had been transferred onto a DIFFERENT lender’s standard variable rate and was paying a massive 4.54% OVER BASE on my monthly repayments!  I was pretty shocked as the SVR of the original mortgage was just 2.14% over base. The mortgage repayments seemed reasonable and the rent was still covering the monthly mortgage payments so it took me a while to notice this. I had my original BTL mortgage with a specialist BTL lender who has since been wound up. All their mortgages were ported onto a prominant Midlands based lender.

I wonder how many people are in the same position and are paying way too much on a mortgage without even realising due to low base rates. I decided to speak to my broker immediately and found that there were much better products on the market that I could remortgage onto saving me £100’s in the process. Could you be doing the same?

If you want to find us to review your portfolio with a view to saving you money click here to contact us directly and we’ll be in touch.

We will be running a monthly Portfolio Surgery session, where our brokers will go through your properties and see if there are any areas where you can increase your cashflow through refinance. We will also be answering any questions you may have on all areas of personal finance – tax, insurance, mortgage finance.

If you are coming to the end of a tie in period on a mortgage here are a few questions to ask yourself:

1.     Check when the end date of any term is due, make sure you leave at least 3 months before the end date to review your options;

2.     Check with the lender what rate of interest you will be paying once you come to the end of the deal.  If higher you need to plan in advance. If lower you need to consider what to do with the extra cash flow. Savings, pensions or repaying mortgages could always be options. How about an offset on your residential home and pay the additional money into that pot. You can still have access to your money but it saves you interest on your own home. If you reinvest into a pension, there is tax relief available or you may like to top up your ISA, providing you tax free flexible savings.  All actions need to be done tax efficiently;

3.     Ask the lender what new products they can offer you;

4.     Check the market for current market rents as they could have risen and any lender will base lending on the market rental income.  It may also be time to increase the rent on your property;

5.     At the same time make sure you review your buildings and contents insurances and any other direct debits associated with the property, one can easily neglect these and they can impact cash flow, so make sure all property costs are competitive.

Please see our daily updated rates table by clicking here and/or contact us and we will be in touch to organise a portfolio surgery session.


Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • MSN Reporter
  • PDF
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

Paragon Relaunches Mortgage Trust Buy to Let Finance

April 20th, 2011

The Mortgage Trust has returned to lending with the launch of a range of buy-to-let products that are only available via intermediaries.  The brand is part of Paragon but stopped lending in February 2008 and is now being relaunched by the firm.

Products include a two-year tracker at 3.99% and a two-year fixed rate deal at 4.99%, both of which are for remortgage customers only, available up to 75% LTV, have a fixed fee of £999 and come with free valuation and legal fees.

John Heron, director of mortgages at Mortgage Trust, says: “Mortgage Trust is extremely well regarded within the intermediary community and has an excellent reputation for catering for simple buy-to-let cases.

“By utilising technology to a much greater extent in the application process via mton-line.co.uk, we will be giving an initial lending decision in minutes. This will deliver a quicker and more efficient process for intermediaries and their landlords.”

Heron adds the brand will be focused on what is known for, that is catering to landlords with less complex needs who own four to five properties, while Mortgage Trust will be expanding its range of products in due course.

Mortgage Trust’s deals are available for buy-to-let applications on single self-contained properties, rental calculation is based on 125% at 5% and applications must be successfully completed by June 24 2011.

Please see our regularly updated mortgage calculator and please feel free to contact us at info@psinvestors.co.uk for more information about this and other buy to let products.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • MSN Reporter
  • PDF
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

Getting Your Buy to Let Mortgage ‘Dipped’ in 2011

March 17th, 2011

This is basically the first stage in securing a mortgage product. It is where your basic personal details are inputted onto the lenders system so that they can check that you are credit worthy of obtaining a mortgage. It is also the stage at which they also assess if you meet their lending criteria for the product you are applying for.

Lenders have their individual systems and this is why it is important not to rush into doing this without obtaining advice as applying for a decision in principle will usually result in the lender credit scoring you, which means that a ‘footprint’ can be left upon your Experian and Equifax credit reports. ‘footprints’ can actually lower a credit score if you have too many, therefore you must not rush into obtaining a decision in principle without seriously considering the lenders criteria.

A qualified mortgage adviser will be able to assist you appropriately once they have taken all the necessary personal details from you. Remember the higher your credit score the higher the chances of being accepted for a mortgage.

In order to help your adviser recommend and apply for a mortgage on your behalf it is advisable to have certain documents easily accessible as it will help speed the process up:

(i)  If you are already an investor and have a portfolio of properties then you should have a spread sheet of your properties, listing the following:

  • Property address;
  • Property description: house, flat, no. beds, freehold, leasehold etc., age, any special features. ( if you have a previous valuation report that will help);
  • Date purchased;
  • Purchase price;
  • Current value;
  • Current mortgage outstanding;
  • Current mortgage product, end date and payrate;
  • Current mortgage payment;
  • Current rental income;
  • Current market rental (if you don’t know the current market property or rental values, now is the time to find out from a local agent).

Remember for any application, purchase or remortgage, the lender will instruct their surveyor to value the property as part of the application process.  They will use local market information and their experience to decide what values will be put on the report sent back to the lender. It is therefore worth researching into past property sales and local market rents before you submit an application to enhance the success of any application. The main reason many BTL applications fail to convert successfully is due to the property valuations being overinflated by clients at the decision in principle stage. You therefore need to be certain the figures your broker is working from are accurate as it will only enhance the chances for successful application and completion and also prevent unnecessary ‘footprints’ on your credit file;

(ii)  Your passport.  Your adviser will need to take a copy of this and the lender may require a copy as well, which the mortgage adviser has to sign as being a true copy. if they cannot see the original it may be worth getting your solicitor to sign it. Other professionals can also sign it and your broker can advise you on this;

(iii)  Proof of address. A recent utility bill or bank statement showing your name and address, dated within the last 2 months would meet this requirement. If you have lived at your current address for less than 3 months, then you will need to also have similar documents for your previous address;

(iv)  Last 3 years accounts. Lenders have differing income requirements and its worth knowing what your net figures are. Now is the time to contact your accountant if you don’t have the figures or documents.  If  income is derived from employment then please store payslips and p60s and file accordingly. Lenders may want to see the last 3 months;

(v)  Proof of any deposit. Lenders may want to know the source of this and see a bank statement showing it in your account.

Applying for a Buy to Let mortgage can only be straight forward and easy if you and your broker are prepared. Lenders have the right to ask for any documentation they feel is necessary for their internal and regulatory procedures. Therefore having the above documents available will ensure your application can successfully complete in a short a time scale as is possible.

To find out more about how you can realistically obtain buy to let mortgage finance in today’s challenging climate, please email us at info@psinvestors.co.uk and we will be in touch within the next 24 hours.  ***Also see our daily updated mortgage calculator by clicking here.***

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • MSN Reporter
  • PDF
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

February 2011 Buy to Let / Landlord Finance Update

February 11th, 2011

This month sees a number of interesting products on the market.   Please be aware that products and rates quoted may not still be available at the time of application:

  • Kensington have announced a product linked to a mortgage club so you need a broker to submit it but it’s a 2 yr fixed at 5.99% at 85% with a 2.5% fee.  They are the first lender to come out with an 85% product with a competitive rental income of 120% at the product payrate.  The individual needs to have a min income of 30,000 for this product and they will accept one years accounts.  Advances up to £350,000, min property value £90,000. Not for first time buyers. New build max lending 65%. Min age 25. Interest only allowed;
  • If you are looking for a product with no tie ins, then TMW are offering a 2 yr tracker at 70%LTV with a 3.5% arrangement fee and rental income of 125% at 4.99%.  TMW do not require neither a minimum personal income nor a proof of income, most nowadays require £25,000. Tracker product clients also have the ability to switch anytime onto their fixed product range with no penalty, so for those wanting to make the most of the low tracker rate but concerned that rates may rise this could be a lender suitable for them;
  • TMW also have a range of products for first time landlords, however do note that the landlord must be a residential home owner;
  • If you are looking for assistance with the mortgage fees, BM Solutions are offering a 4.2% 1 yr tracker product with a 2.5% arrangement fee, £500 cash back and a refund of valuation upon completion. BMS now have a restriction of 3 BTL properties and a lending cap of 2 million across the whole of the Lloyds TSB group which doesn’t tend to make it favourable for the existing portfolio client however for those that don’t their range is competitively priced and the 4.2% tracker quoted above has a competitive rental calculation of 125% at 4.2%;
  • For those who have properties in the south of England, Cambridge BS could be an option. They have 2 products, the lowest being a 3.99% 2 year tracker with a 3.5% fee, using the payrate at 135%. However they require applications to be submitted by paper and lending is restricted to certain southeast regions;
  • For off plan and unusual property types, Natwest continue to be reliable, offering a 4.99% 2 yr tracker with a £1999 fee. They do however restrict lending to 70% on this product and with a rental calculation of 125% at 6.9% it can be viewed as fairly limiting.

To find out more about any of these products and speak to our resident broker, please email us at info@psinvestors.co.uk and we will be in touch within the next 24 hours.  Please subscribe to our newsletter to the left to receive our monthly property investors factsheet.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • MSN Reporter
  • PDF
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

Lisa Orme – A Truly Experienced Property Expert – Speaks with PS Investor Services

December 2nd, 2010

Please see below an interview with Lisa Orme from Keys UK Limited – a genuinely experienced investor that is often referred to as the ‘expert’s expert’.  We discuss her history as a professional property investor; the risks of a bottoming market; whether property today is only for the cash rich; newbie investing / entering the market with low cash reserves; no money down in 2011; tips obtaining mortgage finance in a challenging market; improving your credit rating for the buy to let lenders; the FSA’s ‘Mortgage Market Review’; property options / impending regulation; the base rate rise and some advice for highly geared landlords.

1) For those that do not know, can you give our readers a bit of background about yourself? I’m Lisa Orme but you may also see me referred to as Lisa Williams. I can assure you I’m one in the same person! Orme was my maiden name and Williams is my married name. Most people in property circles know me as Orme so I tend to stick to that.  My husband, Stuart and I, started Keys UK Limited almost ten years ago.  We read ‘Rich Dad, Poor Dad’ by Robert Kiyosaki and that was our epiphany moment.  Wanting to ‘get into property’ we started the letting agency working from home in addition to both having full time jobs but quickly realised it was the landlords who were making the money.  So we sold an endowment policy that would never give us the promised returns and used the £40k it gave us to buy a property to refurb. We sold it and made a £40k profit – a 100% return on our investment. We got the property bug and spent the next 8 years or so investing in and developing property in the Midlands.  When the credit crunch hit and things went quiet we started our own mortgage brokerage. A lot of people thought I was completely mad but it’s a brilliant addition to our business strategy and I had no idea how much I would love it.

2) It has become increasingly apparent that the property market is close to the bottom which many people are seeing as an excellent opportunity – but what do you perceive are the main risks? I actually think its got a way to go yet. We still have the fact that the banks have to repay all of their loans, the VAT increase and massive cuts in the public sector which will knock onto the private sector (especially in the construction industry) and affect confidence which will further affect jobs and incomes and ultimately mean people losing their homes thus creating further falls in the market.  That doesn’t mean its not a good time to buy however; prices are low and if you’re either in and out for quick profit or in it for the long haul you can’t go wrong if you buy sensibly.

2) Do you the property investment market today is only for the cash rich? There’s no doubt that cash is king but not in terms of being able to move quickly on deals but in terms of the levels of deposits being demanded by lenders. But that’s not to say that there aren’t ways to buy property without you having the cash yourself and I’m not talking about so called ‘no money down’ schemes.  If you have cash rich joint venture partners then this is a great way to be able to profit from someone else’s cash if they can profit from your knowledge and experience. Partnering together on mortgages is perfectly legitimate way to work together. Buying cash then remortgaging or topping up the difference on bridging then selling or remortgaging are also good and totally legitimate strategies.

3) For newbies – do you think it’s advisable to enter as a property investor without savings or some kind of cash back up fund? Absolutely not.  Even if you fall for a no money down scheme property is still a very cash intensive business. If you have a couple of months void period, a boiler breakdown or what happened to me with one of my first tenants trashing the property leaving £10,000 worth of damage and £6,000 of rent arrears then you’re going to be in trouble!  You should ensure you have several thousand pounds of cash available for these eventualities at the very least. And the more properties the bigger the reserve should be.

4) Should a new investor wish to enter the market with a small amount of cash reserves – what would be your best advice? Ensure you have a back up supply of cash whether that be a JV partner or relative, a credit card or an overdraft. Not that I’d recommend getting into debt other than the mortgage for a property but to go into property with no reserve at all is just crazy.

5) What are your thoughts on no money down in the current market (for example using a secured loan to bridge the deposit and very other strategies being used)? As long as there is full disclosure to the lender of your ACTUAL purchase price then I don’t have problem with it. The problem is none of the schemes I have seen do this and all involve non-disclosure which is potentially mortgage fraud and is being committed by the applicant.  There are lenders that may consider more creative deal structures using borrowed money for deposits, vendor gifts or alternative assets/security being used as the deposit but none of these will be the main buy to let lenders. These will be commercial type lenders that will want to know every aspect of the deal before agreeing to it and probably charge significantly higher rates and fees as a result.

6) As an experienced mortgage finance specialist, do you think the main buy to let lenders will continue to accept these kinds of applications (knowing that investors are leveraging themselves)? Lenders DON’T accept these type of applications at all. They are submitted subversively. Lenders are duped into believing the client is paying x for a property when they are in fact paying y. If the lender was informed (as per their terms and conditions) of the ACTUAL purchase price then they will most likely refuse the case completely but at best only lend based on the ACTUAL purchase price.

7) In terms of obtaining mortgage finance, what would be your suggestions for an investor to improve their positions in the eyes of the buy to let lenders? A good credit score is only half the story and I’m fully aware of people with over 900 on their credit files failing and those with much lower scores passing.  Lenders will be looking at your score and your credit profile combined as well as a number of other factors. Any one of these alone may not have that dramatic an impact but combine two or more and you could find yourself being rejected by lenders:-

  • Ensure you are on the electoral roll;
  • Avoid moving house frequently – the ideal is one address covering the last 3 years;
  • Keep your current bank account clean; by this I mean avoid late charges, going over overdraft limits, ensure you have plenty of credits and debits on a regular basis and that they all get paid;
  • Ensure you have at least one utility bill in your name – there’s a tendency for one adult to take responsibility for all bills in many households but this can work against you so put them in joint names or split them between you;
  • Watch those credit cards and loans – even if you have never missed a payment lots of unsecured debts will adversely affect your applications;
  • Similarly if you have lots of credit cards and aren’t using them cancel a few – lots of available unsecured debt can have the same detrimental affect;
  • NEVER miss a mortgage payment – unless you have a very good reason for this and the evidence to back it up this will certainly result in a declined application;
  • Avoid missing credit card and loan payments – the odd one over several years is unlikely to have that bad an effect but lots of them or a regular habit of missed payments will mean no.

It’s not true that those with large portfolios can’t borrow as many of my clients could testify and given we are extremely busy with everyone from brand new investors through to investors with multimillion pound portfolios I know lenders are still lending and clients are still borrowing!

8)Can investors and landlords expect to feel the effects of the FSA ‘Mortgage Market Review’? The Mortgage Market Review is primarily concerned with residential mortgages but we are seeing lenders be overly cautions for example self cert was only mooted as being targeted by the FSA but in order to pre-empt the FSA hatchet the lenders just withdrew from self cert and there is now no self cert residential mortgages available at all!  There are rumours about banning interest only mortgages and there are many buy to let investors rightly concerned about this but again it is very unlikely to apply to buy to let and more likely we will only see changes in residential lending and already have.  The impact is therefore that lenders pull the plug prematurely and withdraw from problem areas or areas that they see as requiring more effort. Buy to let is certainly one of those areas which is why we are left with so few lenders. And those that are left tightening criteria and reducing lending levels.  But there are some new players too and likely to be more in the coming few years so all is not lost for buy to let; on the contrary I think the future holds great promise.

9) You are very well known for your understanding of property options – what would be your advice to people looking into this strategy for the short to medium term future? Short would be the operative word for me. We will now only do option deal where there is a very defined and relatively short term exit ideally under 12 months.  A perfect example might be a redemption penalty situation; the clients can sell for say £120k which suits you if it were not for a redemption penalty that adds an additional £6,000 to the debt and finishes the deal for you both. This is a perfect example of where I would use an option to seal the deal, let out the property and then complete on the purchase when the redemption penalty expires.  The clients have moved on, there’s a clear and defined exit and they will be motivated to complete on the deal.

Too many lease option deals are being done where debts are involved and often the sellers get sellers remorse once you have taken away the immediate pain. I am aware of many investors who have lost a lot of money on options that they will never get to complete on because the owner has refused to exercise the option. Taking these to court is a waste of time and money.

10) With the increased media attention options have receiving this year – can we expect to see regulation come into play (as with sell and rent back a few years ago)? This is extremely likely and the FSA already have their eye on these.  It’s not going to happen just yet as with sale and rent back it will be when a number of cases are highlighted in the press or to organisations such as Shelter. This is not likely to come about until we see a wave of repossessions when interest rates rise or when house prices go up.  In the former case investors who have taken on properties due to a low rate on the underlying mortgage will find their cashflow stretched and will walk away (as the option legally though not morally allows them to do) leaving the ‘seller’ in the lurch and probably not realising that this could happen.

In the case of house prices most investors are only going to want to exercise the option when house prices have gone up sufficiently to make it worth their while. At this point seller remorse kicks in and the seller realises how much equity they’re giving up. A quick call to citizen’s advice or their solicitor to check on the validity of these agreements or going to ground will prevent many investors being able to exercise their options.

The real concern comes where there are also tenant buyers who may have paid deposits that investors have spent and/or paid higher rents expecting those to be credited towards their home.  I’ve already seen several examples of investors heading towards bankruptcy and tenant buyers being unaware that their money is lost and option worthless.  It is when all this starts to unravel we will see regulatory changes; all too late of course but the fallout has the potential to be huge and to damage the industry further.

11) What is your advice to people who maybe on tracker / variable rates and are concerned about the eventual base rate rise? Assume rates are going to rise! It would be unwise to get comfortable on the current low rates.  Preparation is key; it’s no good when rates rise saying ‘I never saw that coming’!  If that means selling some or even all of your properties then do it! If it also means not buying any more and consolidating them so be it.

12) And – for the highly geared landlord concerned about the slow recovery of house prices – would you be able to provide some potential risk mitigation strategies? There are a number of things landlords can do but they all involve assessing the situation and getting real with yourself – there’s no quick fix once you have decided to bury your head in the sand. Some suggestions include:

  • Getting a job!
  • Expanding your services – manage property deals or refurbishments for other investors;
  • Curb your spending (personal and property) – if that means getting rid of the sports car or downsizing your home so be it;
  • Budget and monitor your expenses like a hawk;
  • Improve cashflow – can you increase your rents? Can you offer added incentives or a new fixed term tenancy? Can you let to LHA tenants (although be careful of the changes next year)?;
  • Manage your properties yourself to reduce management and letting fees;
  • Convert single lets to Houses of Multiple Occupation (HMOs);
  • Remortgage – whilst many people are on low base rate trackers, I’m constantly surprised by how many aren’t. Speak to your mortgage adviser about the current products on offer – you may surprised at how low some of the rates actually are and with LTVs up to 80%, things aren’t as bad as many make out;
  • Refinance – it may be better to pull out some cash as a reserve for tougher times now than not be able to later.  Don’t spend it of course but placed in a decent savings account, it may help you out if times get tough;
  • Insure against rate rises – it’s possible to take out an insurance policy to hedge against rate rises. You simply determine when you want the insurance to kick in and they’ll cover the payments over and above that point. Its nowhere near as expensive as investors believe it to be, for example: to cover £1,000,000 worth of interest only mortgages 2% beyond where they currently are (e.g. current rate 2.5% so insurance will pay anything over 4.5%) will cost just £262 a month;
  • Finally do talk to your lender even if you haven’t missed any payments yet. They don’t want to repossess, especially not in the current market. If they can help they will, and will help you do a portfolio review, determine a strategy going forward and a ‘what if’ should the worst happen.

For mortgage advice and information contact Lisa at lisa@keys-mortgages.com or call 024 7617 0096; please mention PSI.

You can also get updates on new products and services, financing tips and advice at www.twitter.com/keysmortgages and property investor updates and tips at www.twitter.com/lisaorme

The above is for information purposes only; rates can change and may not be applicable at the time of publication. Please consult appropriate professionals and contact us for up to date quotations. Keys (UK) Limited is an Appointed Representative of Julian Harris Mortgages Ltd. Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority in the conduct of mortgage and general insurance business with FSA No. 304155. Your home may be repossessed if you do not keep up repayments on a mortgage or other loan secured on it. Think carefully before securing other debts against your home. Buy to let (pure) and commercial mortgages are not regulated by the FSA.

For full details of our terms, fees and disclosures please go to the Keys Mortgages website at www.keys-mortgages.com

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • MSN Reporter
  • PDF
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

Birmingham Midshires on Buy To Let Mortgage Lending in 2010/11

November 18th, 2010

Further to our previous interview with Paul Howard from the Mortgage Works, we were very pleased to be able to ask BM Solutions some questions on the current market place.  The company has been very well established in buy to let for almost 2 decades (with a current 40 percent market share) and has remained in a solid position despite the obvious difficulties that have occurred over the last few years. We talked to head of sales Phil Rickards on a range of topics including the company’s history; confidence levels amongst lenders; BM Solution’s short / medium / long term strategy; risks from a BTL lending perspective; new FSA regulations (the Mortgage Market Review); the BTL lender-borrower relationship moving forward and the future of new build property.

1) Can you talk through the history of BM Solutions in the buy to let market? We have been established in the sector for many years now. Personally, I have been with the company for 18 years and witnessed a change from what was once a building society with less than 1 percent share of the mortgage market into an Intermediary dedicated BTL Lender accounting for around 40 percent of total lending in the buy to let sector alongside our House 2 House proposition ,which is basically a 2nd property and self build scheme.

2) Why was the decision made to focus specifically on buy to let? It’s where our strength has always been.  We did, in the past, lend in other sectors such as self-cert and subprime but the majority of our business has always been in the BTL sector – and it’s where we always saw the future of BM Solutions.  Indeed, we have remained fully committed to the UK BTL market despite the current tough economic conditions.

3) Do you think there is generally more confidence in the buy to let lending market despite some recent drops? The credit crunch has obviously had a massive effect on the property market in general – for our buy to lending levels the situation is no different.  For 2010, the BTL market should account for around £10 billion of mortgage lending whereas, at its peak, a few years back it was at £47 billion.  Despite this, there is definitely more confidence appearing in the market with our own research telling us that BTL borrowers are taking a longer term view of investment than was perhaps seen before – our research has pointed to people looking at between 15 to 20 years.  Today, what the market needs more is some healthy competition and it’s great to see some new lenders or previous lenders in the sector returning.  This has got to be good news for landlords.

4) Looking back to the onset of the credit crunch a few years ago – do you think, on a general level, that buy to let was taken far too lightly by lenders in general? Talking from BMS’s perspective, we have never taken buy to let too lightly – we have always stated clearly that it should be treated as a long term investment and landlords / borrowers really must do their homework before entering.  The days of entering the market for fast profits have gone. Of all the lenders, we have remained totally committed to this sector and, whilst this has been difficult in the current economic climate, we will remain steadfast.  It’s fair to say that we have had to make criteria changes to ensure that we continue to support the sector. The market has changed dramatically so we have adapted our proposition in line with the new conditions to ensure that we continue to lend responsibly.

5) From a lending perspective – what do you see as the main risks as the country begins its slow recovery? The main risk is that the recovery is not going to be quick. Lenders and borrowers, need to maintain awareness that recovery is going to be a long and drawn out process.  As for BM’s target market, there is a solid bank of mortgage intermediaries who have come through the financial crisis and remain in the sector for the long term offering professional mortgage advice to new and existing Landlords.

6) Where do you see the key areas of growth in terms of your own buy to let lending procedures? As I mentioned, like any other lender, we have had to revise how we operate in the market. For 2011 specifically we are in good shape.  We feel confident about entering the year with a consistent proposition which I think the market needs.

7) Do you see higher deposits as something that will remain for the medium term future? I think it’s important to manage landlords’ expectations and certainly as far as BM Solutions is concerned, we have no plans in the short term (ie. 2011) to change criteria, particularly with regards to loan to values.  That’s not to say that they will not change in the future but I can easily see 2011 remaining level in line with our present criteria.

8)What are your thoughts on the new rules being established by FSA including the of banning self-certification mortgages, tough affordability, income verification checks and other detailed borrow analysis procedures that lenders would have to carry out under its Mortgage Market Review? If we talk specifically about buy to let, in terms of the way a lender behaves – most operate by looking at rental assessments.  We have used this methodology since we started lending in the buy to let sector and are confident about its ability to provide us with an accurate picture of loan security.  The new criteria being stipulated by the FSA is still very much in consultation stages, and we’ll have to wait and see what the final impacts are.

9) Do you think the new rules will semi-paralyse the industry as is being debated at the moment? We’ll have to wait and see what the new rules are before making any predictions on the impact. However, it seems that the aim is to instil a more meticulous case analysis procedure and ensure that borrowers have the capacity to be able to handle their commitments.  Borrowers should have nothing to worry about as long as the income they provide is correct and can be substantiated.  We’re committed to ensuring any changes balance the long term health of the industry.

10) If rental assessments remain as your main criteria for analysis, what about when occasional volatile movements happen – as has been seen in some local marketplaces in the last few years? We stick to a tried and tested rental calculation and we have a team of professionally trained surveyors who will analyse the figures before we agree to lend.  We have no concerns over this methodology and this has been part of our in-house procedures since we commenced lending in the buy to let sector. It’s a dynamic processes, we’ll continue to make changes as and when they’re necessary.

11) How do you think the balance can be struck between lending that is too expansive (as prior to the credit crunch) versus being highly restrictive (as debatably what is occurring now)? It’s very easy to confuse really stifled criteria with the fact that there is a considerable shortage of funding for lenders themselves.  We as a lender only operate in a very different funding environment to days gone by and, equally, we have a duty to lend responsibly and prudently.  From our perspective, as I mentioned, above we have a considerable market share already so it’s fair to say that we’re doing our bit but, yes, the more lenders that come on to the market, the better.  We are continually reviewing our policy, ensuring we meet evolving market conditions – such as new ways of innovating and keeping the market fresh.  In November, for example, we had a 7 day ‘mortgage sale’ – something we hadn’t done before offering some extremely good products for a limited time period. This was a huge success.  This is just an example of the fact that we want to demonstrate to landlords that there is a desire to lend whilst being mindful of the fact that the market has changed.

12) Do you think there is going to be reluctance on the part of lenders to enter the marketplace in the coming years?  There is a growing confidence amongst the buy to let sector – particularly due to the fact that there is growing demand for rented accommodation which will undoubtedly continue.  Whilst mortgage market criteria in a general level remains tight, more people will look to rent so it is certainly not all doom and gloom for both lenders and landlords.

13) What is your attitude towards new build lending – particularly in light of the ongoing situation of low supply? There’s clearly been a change in this sector of the market and it’s been a tough one.  Buy to let still does not remain reliant on new build but then there is also the fact that new housing is clearly required in the UK.  There has been an over-supply of new build apartments which remains a problem due to low activity levels in the housing market on a general level.  As the market matures again, we’ll keep reviewing our criteria to see if things can change.  We have a specific housing development team at Lloyds Banking Group who play an important part in managing the relationship between Lender and Housing Developer.  This is a role which is expected to expand as confidence in this market segment increases.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • MSN Reporter
  • PDF
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

The Council of Mortgage Lenders (CML) on the 2010 / 2011 Market for Property Investors

October 20th, 2010

Essentially an organisation that sees the growth of the housing finance as fundamental to the sustained recovery of the market, the Council of Mortgage Lenders (CML) are continually influential on government policy making and are an important organisation for property investors to be aware of.  We were therefore very pleased to be able to speak to spokesman Bernard Clarke on a range of topics including the recent drop in house prices demonstrated by the Halifax; homeownership trends in the UK; the importance of the buy to let market; the BTL lending landscape moving forward into 2011; buy to let regulation / professionalism; new build lending; the implications of the low bank base rate; future inflationary pressures; some advice for new property investors amongst others.

1) Many economists and commentators were surprised to see the larger than expected dip from the Halifax property price index recently – what were/are your thoughts? Over the last couple of years we’ve given up on forecasting house prices due to the fact that there has been so much uncertainty in the aftermath of the credit crunch, both in terms of the implications for the housing market, and the extent and scale of the policy response to get the country out of its problems.  In addition, there are a small number of transactions which simply adds to difficulty of measuring house prices effectively.  Demand is weak for all sorts of reasons, such as a shortage of mortgage finance, a lack of confidence by buyers and there is a shortage of new property coming into the market which, we feel, makes price predictions even more difficult.  In short, we have no plans to return to predicting house prices.

2) How important does the CML view the buy-to-let market in relation to the UK’s housing industry from a long term perspective? We think it’s very important – the whole market is made up of three forms of tenure: owner-occupier, social housing and the private rented sector.  The Survey of English Housing showed that over the last 8 years of so home-ownership has declined from 71 percent to 68 percent.  Clearly there are pressures in the funding and supply of social housing sector – so the best option for meeting housing needs in the medium term is through the private rented sector, and the buy to let market has a very important role in meeting this demand.

3) Do you think the UK general public’s passion for home ownership is waning? We have just published research that shows that it is not the case.  Over a long period of time, we have asked people about their aspirations to be homeowners with the question “would you like to be a homeowner 10 years from now?” When we asked  again recently, we came back with the highest ever positive response to that question – even prior to the credit crunch – at 80 percent.  Short-term responses to the question have taken a dip, which we believe is due to what is happening in the housing market at the moment and the uncertainty towards the market on a general level.

4) As 2010 begins drawing to a close – where do you see the position of the main buy-to-let lenders moving forward into 2011, particularly when compared to prior to the credit crunch? Whilst we have had some very encouraging recent announcements from lenders such as Paragon and The Mortgage Works, who are looking to continue their expansion in the buy to let market, we expect the sector to be affected by the same issues as with the mainstream market – with the prominent one being a lack of funding.

5) Can we expect to see any major changes in the buy-to-let lending landscape in the near future? It is difficult to predict this, particularly in the current absence of funding, but, as far as lenders moving in and out of the market or launching new products, that is in the hands of individual firms and we do not know what their plans may be.  As a trade body, we work to create the best environment for lenders to operate within – but it is up to them how they want to make their commercial pitch.

6) Do you feel that there are enough professional standards within the buy-to-let sector? Yes, much of the evidence of the buy to let sector has pointed to improved standards in terms of choice, availability and quality of privately rented housing provision.

7) What are your thoughts on regulation of the buy to let industry? We have made it clear that we are not convinced about this.  There may be a need to look at the main causes of problems within the buy to let sector – this, however, is more about people’s decisions to invest in property rather than taking out a mortgage in order to do so.

8)It was recently announced that the CML will be joining forces with the NLA – why was this decision made? We work with all parties, agencies and representative bodies with an interest in the sector.  There is, as such, no specific plan for our work with the NLA – the objective is more to form a union of bodies representing the ever-changing agenda of the UK housing industry.

9) How do you feel about the current level of property investment / landlord education that exists at the moment? If you look at the evidence that may point to bad property investment education, it would be worth examining repossession / delinquency statistics – the buy to let sector is comparable with the mainstream mortgage market which would suggest that most investors and landlords are making the right kinds of decisions.

10) In terms of the lending on new build properties, many lenders we speak to remain aversive – either applying a stringent criteria or refusing to lend at all.  As long term indicators are pointing to an undersupply of housing in the UK – how long will this last for? Lenders are taking a risk averse approach to all types of transactions in the market at the moment – not solely for new builds – and where there are issues of over-supply and valuation, they are looking particularly keenly at the security of the loan.  We don’t expect any change in the housing finance environment.  WE have tried to create greater transparency by working on improved disclosure of incentives by developers (discounts and other transactional related benefits) – which has often occurred in regional markets where there is an over-supply of property.  What the lender needs is to have a clear understanding of the exact nature of the transaction and to make a decision accordingly.  We hope this transparency will help build confidence in the sector for everybody – uncertainty in an environment like this is not helpful.

11) Readers would be aware that the CML regularly announces repossession statistics – would you be able to provide a broad based forecast for the next 5 years on repossessions? I’m afraid we can’t!  One of the main reasons for this is the uncertainty we’ve already discussed which makes us reluctant to forecast too far ahead.  In the past we have predicted arrears two years ahead and have then revised our figures.  Whilst things are perhaps looking a little bit more stable now, the market since 2007 has been generally unstable and we have policy intervention on a large scale and a new government.  What we will be doing is looking at market forecasts towards the end of the year (for 2011) taking into account of the Comprehensive Spending Review and its implications.

12) Late last month Credit Action announced that some £10.9 billion worth of loans (both secured and unsecured) had been written off – do you expect to see this as a continuing pattern – and how will it affect the future of the secured loans market? Again, we will not be forecasting arrears until the end of the year.  I suspect the main reason why arrears have been kept in check is the very low interest rates, and also unemployment has not risen as high as many commentators feared – although there may be more uncertainty about that in the aftermath of the Comprehensive Spending Review.

13) With the UK base rate being historically low and many property owners benefiting from this fact, do you think the housing market is experiencing a calm before the storm? You could almost say it is a ‘calm after the storm’ due to the fact that we have a very low level of transactions and subdued levels of lending activity in the aftermath of the financial crisis in 2007 and 2008.  We do not expect to see any significant change in overall market direction in the months ahead.  When we finalise our forecasts for 2011, we will be looking ahead over 12 months to see if there are any changes to be expected.

14) In terms of the inflationary concerns that will mount sooner or later and there will have to be a base rate increase – how do you see the change then? Our study on negative equity concluded that approximately 900,000 people with the large majority having less than £10,000.  Within a few months of completing that analysis, however, house prices had begun to rise again and, in the spring of this year, we revised our figures to around 600,000.  There is still potential volatility in the marketplace and, therefore, it’s still difficult to predict the number of people who will be in negative equity.  Nevertheless, as long as homeowners are in negative equity but are still+ able to pay their mortgage – that should not create a problem.  The outlook for interest rates is that they will stay low – and when they do rise, most commentators believe it will be at a slow and gradual pace.

15) In terms of lenders working with borrowers more – that seems to be more commonplace in attempt to resolve issues better, would you agree? There has been a concerted effort for lenders to minimise the impact, which borrowers have responded well to – for example by making lenders aware of any payment difficulties they may be having, which gives everyone the best chance of working to a solution the suits the client’s individual circumstances.  The government has helped with measures to support homeowners in difficulty – but we’ve already seen a cut in the rate of support for mortgage interest from 6.08 percent to 3.63 percent. The qualification period for income support for mortgage interest was reduced by the last government from 39 to 13 weeks (which previously caused considerable arrears to accumulate).  We would urge the coalition government to keep these measurements in place – although there are costs there are also significant savings, such as the cost of re-housing people as a result of repossession.

16) What would be your advice to new property investors looking at entering the market in the next few years? The evidence from our arrears and repossession statistics suggests that the decisions made by property investors are broadly the right ones.  We will continue to see opportunities for investors to make the right kind of acquisitions but funding is clearly going to be a constraint in the buy to let sector, as it is in the mainstream mortgage market.

17) What is the ‘MICE’ event being run by the CML and how can readers find out more? MICE stands for the Mortgage Industry Conference and Exhibition which we hold annually.  The day will see a  debate  around a number of key issues in mortgage lending and housing markets, with contributions by some excellent speakers.  Please click on the following link for more information.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • MSN Reporter
  • PDF
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

Interview with The Mortgage Works (TMW)

June 23rd, 2010

Please see an interview with Paul Howard – Head of Intermediary Sales – at The Mortgage Works (TMW), one of the UK’s leading buy-to-let lenders.  Property investors were recently very interested in hearing that TMW were the only mortgage company in the current marketplace to raise their loan to value ratio to 80 percent.  We ask what was their reasoning behind this, particularly as several other prominent lenders have failed to follow suit, as well as looking into their thoughts on the short, medium and long-term; how lender behaviour has / is changing; the new Financial Policy Committee (FPC); the new build phenomenon; Local Housing Allowance lending and more:

1) Can you start by giving a brief history of TMWs’ presence in the UK buy to let market? Sure, the Mortgage Works actually began as the Sun Bank which was a subsidiary of Sun Life Canada (an insurance company).  In the mid 1990s, the company started lending in what was then termed as ‘residential investments’ (the term ‘buy-to-let’ was pretty much non-existent at that time).  The company was subsequently acquired by the Portman Building Society and, in 2002, the name was changed to The Mortgage Works.  In 2007, Portman merged with the Nationwide and the company has been a subsidiary ever since.  Today, we are one of the two largest buy-to-let lenders in the UK (the other being Birmingham Midshires) and are very comfortable in the market place.

2) Many investors were excited to hear that you were the first to offer 80 percent loan to value with a competitive pay rate after an extended period of buy to lenders taking a stricter attitude – what was the rationale behind this and, perhaps more importantly for our readers, is it a sign of things to come? The move to 80 percent loan to value was essentially a direct reflection of how our buy to let lending portfolio has performed throughout the recession.  As a company, we are proud to say that we have historically been prudent lenders and, as a result, coped well in what has been the worst economic downturn since the 1930s.  Additionally, the recent changes in the market place also influenced our decision to decrease down-payment requirements.  When compared to a year ago, the housing market on a general level has seen some improvements – for example, the drops we witnessed in 2008 and 2009 are in no way as severe as they are today.  Additionally, we are of course witnessing a very low bank base rate which has helped manage affordability and kept our delinquency levels low.  So, overall, our business model has remained successful and, consequently, we like buy-to-let and want to increase our presence.  In answer to the second part of your question, I would very much doubt we would be increasing it for a while as we appreciate that – whilst the market is improving – things remain very fragile, particularly from a broader economic perspective.

3) Generally are you lot more confident about the buy-to-let market now? Absolutely, and I think buy-to-let investors should be too.  The main reasons are that properties are much cheaper and are offering more solid returns than what was perhaps becoming the case in the build up to the credit crunch.  For those that already own buy-to-let property, most have seen an improvement in their equity position in the last year and many (such as those on trackers and variable rates) have benefitted from very low mortgage payments.  Furthermore, bringing in factors such as an increase in the amount of people looking to rent as well as lack of supply of housing in the UK – we feel it is certainly an advantage to be in the industry.

4) As the UK enters into a slow recovery period – what do you think will happen in the short/medium term buy-to-let market? Yes, the economy still remains in a relatively vulnerable position and our view is that we will remain in a low rate environment for some time to come (even they do start to rise I think it would be at a slow pace).  However, we also expect to see a continued level of subdued lending. The Council of Mortgage Lenders’ (CML) forecast on the total market size is at £150 billion for this year; last year it was £142 billion, representing a very negligible rise.  Indeed, nobody within the industry is suggesting that next year is going to be any different.  So I believe that buy-let-investors should be expected to see very slow to modest growth due to the fact that banks these days are ever concerned about their own ability to borrow from the money markets and many are also facing securitization issues.  The level of growth that the buy to let industry will witness in the medium term will depend on the willingness of more lenders to come back into the marketplace – at the moment many have the scourge of the recent past weighing over them and view buy-to-let as risky.  It should also be noted that most of what is being said here applies to the overall market and not just buy to let.

5) Continuing on this point and looking back to the onset of the credit crunch a few years ago – do you think, on a general level, that buy to let was taken far too lightly by lenders in general? I would not say in general, more by some.  I think that many practices that were undertaken are now clearly viewed as a mistake which has resulted in more usage of the word ‘toxic’ to describe them – which is a great shame as our experience of them has been everything but toxic.   One example would be the ‘day-one’ remortgage: a process where investors were able to effectively pull out their initial down payment, often with extra cash to spare in a very short space of time – whilst many were able to build their portfolio quickly using this method, when the market changed it meant that banks were exposed due to having large portfolios of clients with very little/no equity.  Another example would be lending to so-called ‘property clubs’, who largely focused on pooling investors funds together to buy over-valued stock only for the market to crash, leaving enormous debt positions and very unfortunate consequences.

6) And going on from that, how has TMW’s underwriting procedure changed since the credit crunch? I don’t think the procedure has changed hugely – as I mentioned above, we have always been relatively careful lenders but it would be fair to say that apart from stricter loan-to-value ratios we are also requiring higher payment calculations as well as placing a particular importance on any applicants credit rating (the criteria of which has also increased slightly and which also applies to existing customers).  Overall, however, we are using the same processes as before with buy-to-let: a professional surveyor will inform what the open market value and realistic medium-long term rental figure is for a property which will enable us to determine the viability of providing the loan – a fairly robust practice followed by most lenders which I would not imagine to change for some time.

7) We wanted to get your thoughts on the recent inception of the Financial Policy Committee (FPC) in relation to the future of the buy to let industry? It’s probably too early to tell but the new body certainly intends to regulate the buy to let market which will certainly affect the way lending procedures are managed across the board – this is going to be a challenge for both lenders and landlords.  For us at TMW, however, such regulation is unlikely to make that much of a difference as we already treat buy to let mortgage / further advance / remortgage and other secured lending applications in exactly the same way as we do with regulated prime applications.  Any mortgage application made through the Nationwide is already subject to the necessary controls of the FSA so we would need to adapt according to the new regulations – yet we do not envisage this as being a significant overhaul of our existing practices.

8)You mentioned new-build property clubs before – the property investment community has, in recent times, noticed a large amount of this stock come back on to the market place – perhaps more realistically priced in light of the market changes.  What are TMWs thoughts on lending on these types of property? We have, for some time, had some concerns about new build apartment blocks in particular – in fact, we stopped lending on them back in December 2004 (although we do lend on new build houses).  As I mentioned above, our reasoning for this was the glut of over-priced properties combined with several unscrupulous investment clubs effectively playing the mortgage system – another reason which eventually fuelled the collapse of the market.  Whilst you are right that this position is passing now, I still don’t think we are at the stage where we are comfortable to lend on them as yet.  I think the majority of buy-to-let lenders would concur due to the fact that it was not too long ago that eye-wateringly large sums of money were lost as a result of going too heavily into this market.  Another concern that is readily apparent is the fact that it remains very difficult, from a surveying perspective, to truly value new build properties due to, firstly, a lack of comparable sold data due to the current low activity in local market places and, secondly, the issue of many developers releasing their stock in batches – thereby changing the valuation dynamics (something that has, for a long time, effected the way we view this type stock).  Readers who are still interested in buying new build should not that there are lenders out there who will work with new-builds, but it is highly likely they would offer a product with a low loan to value and undertake fine-toothed due diligence to ensure that their interest in the asset is protected.

9) What are your views on landlords who house Local Housing Allowance (LHA) tenants? We have no issues with lending to landlords who let to LHA tenants – our position is focused around the property owners ability to maintain the loan and the fact that he/she would have carried out appropriate due diligence upon application (which we would obviously verify during our underwriting procedure).  We will undertake the necessary checks on the landlord and NOT the tenant as it will always be the former who will be looked into if things go wrong (which, in reality, they rarely do).  This is the approach we have adopted for the last 2 years and seems to be working very well.

10) What would be your advice to property investors and landlords to best prepare themselves to obtain a buy to let mortgage? The importance of keeping a spotless credit record cannot be understated, as the merest glitch at the moment can sabotage your entire application (this goes for any buy-to-let application, not just with TMW).  As important is to undertake detailed due diligence – focus on the area (schools, hospitals, shops, banks, chemists  and other local amenities); the specific location; demand / supply; what tenants you are likely to house; earnings; yield comparables; crime statistics; transport links to name a few.  One of the many advantages of the modern times we live in is that most of this information is readily available for free!

11) Lastly, what about remortgaging?  Would you adopt a similar lending policy to how you would a purchase mortgage? Our lending principles with regards to re-mortgaging remain broadly in line with house purchases – the process does often tend to move quicker due to most of the information we need already being in place (such as Assured Shorthold Tenancy agreements and other relevant documentation pertaining to the property).  At the moment, we are seeing that many existing investment property owners are not needing / wishing to re-mortgage so as to maintain the favorable terms they are currently receiving as a result of the low bank base rate.  The fact that it is not financially in their interest to remortgage has had an effect on this side of the market for us – but we expect this to gradually change over time.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • MSN Reporter
  • PDF
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon