Archive for the ‘Tips for Property Investing’ Category

Lisa Orme – A Truly Experienced Property Expert – Speaks with PS Investor Services

December 2nd, 2010

Please see below an interview with Lisa Orme from Keys UK Limited – a genuinely experienced investor that is often referred to as the ‘expert’s expert’.  We discuss her history as a professional property investor; the risks of a bottoming market; whether property today is only for the cash rich; newbie investing / entering the market with low cash reserves; no money down in 2011; tips obtaining mortgage finance in a challenging market; improving your credit rating for the buy to let lenders; the FSA’s ‘Mortgage Market Review’; property options / impending regulation; the base rate rise and some advice for highly geared landlords.

1) For those that do not know, can you give our readers a bit of background about yourself? I’m Lisa Orme but you may also see me referred to as Lisa Williams. I can assure you I’m one in the same person! Orme was my maiden name and Williams is my married name. Most people in property circles know me as Orme so I tend to stick to that.  My husband, Stuart and I, started Keys UK Limited almost ten years ago.  We read ‘Rich Dad, Poor Dad’ by Robert Kiyosaki and that was our epiphany moment.  Wanting to ‘get into property’ we started the letting agency working from home in addition to both having full time jobs but quickly realised it was the landlords who were making the money.  So we sold an endowment policy that would never give us the promised returns and used the £40k it gave us to buy a property to refurb. We sold it and made a £40k profit – a 100% return on our investment. We got the property bug and spent the next 8 years or so investing in and developing property in the Midlands.  When the credit crunch hit and things went quiet we started our own mortgage brokerage. A lot of people thought I was completely mad but it’s a brilliant addition to our business strategy and I had no idea how much I would love it.

2) It has become increasingly apparent that the property market is close to the bottom which many people are seeing as an excellent opportunity – but what do you perceive are the main risks? I actually think its got a way to go yet. We still have the fact that the banks have to repay all of their loans, the VAT increase and massive cuts in the public sector which will knock onto the private sector (especially in the construction industry) and affect confidence which will further affect jobs and incomes and ultimately mean people losing their homes thus creating further falls in the market.  That doesn’t mean its not a good time to buy however; prices are low and if you’re either in and out for quick profit or in it for the long haul you can’t go wrong if you buy sensibly.

2) Do you the property investment market today is only for the cash rich? There’s no doubt that cash is king but not in terms of being able to move quickly on deals but in terms of the levels of deposits being demanded by lenders. But that’s not to say that there aren’t ways to buy property without you having the cash yourself and I’m not talking about so called ‘no money down’ schemes.  If you have cash rich joint venture partners then this is a great way to be able to profit from someone else’s cash if they can profit from your knowledge and experience. Partnering together on mortgages is perfectly legitimate way to work together. Buying cash then remortgaging or topping up the difference on bridging then selling or remortgaging are also good and totally legitimate strategies.

3) For newbies – do you think it’s advisable to enter as a property investor without savings or some kind of cash back up fund? Absolutely not.  Even if you fall for a no money down scheme property is still a very cash intensive business. If you have a couple of months void period, a boiler breakdown or what happened to me with one of my first tenants trashing the property leaving £10,000 worth of damage and £6,000 of rent arrears then you’re going to be in trouble!  You should ensure you have several thousand pounds of cash available for these eventualities at the very least. And the more properties the bigger the reserve should be.

4) Should a new investor wish to enter the market with a small amount of cash reserves – what would be your best advice? Ensure you have a back up supply of cash whether that be a JV partner or relative, a credit card or an overdraft. Not that I’d recommend getting into debt other than the mortgage for a property but to go into property with no reserve at all is just crazy.

5) What are your thoughts on no money down in the current market (for example using a secured loan to bridge the deposit and very other strategies being used)? As long as there is full disclosure to the lender of your ACTUAL purchase price then I don’t have problem with it. The problem is none of the schemes I have seen do this and all involve non-disclosure which is potentially mortgage fraud and is being committed by the applicant.  There are lenders that may consider more creative deal structures using borrowed money for deposits, vendor gifts or alternative assets/security being used as the deposit but none of these will be the main buy to let lenders. These will be commercial type lenders that will want to know every aspect of the deal before agreeing to it and probably charge significantly higher rates and fees as a result.

6) As an experienced mortgage finance specialist, do you think the main buy to let lenders will continue to accept these kinds of applications (knowing that investors are leveraging themselves)? Lenders DON’T accept these type of applications at all. They are submitted subversively. Lenders are duped into believing the client is paying x for a property when they are in fact paying y. If the lender was informed (as per their terms and conditions) of the ACTUAL purchase price then they will most likely refuse the case completely but at best only lend based on the ACTUAL purchase price.

7) In terms of obtaining mortgage finance, what would be your suggestions for an investor to improve their positions in the eyes of the buy to let lenders? A good credit score is only half the story and I’m fully aware of people with over 900 on their credit files failing and those with much lower scores passing.  Lenders will be looking at your score and your credit profile combined as well as a number of other factors. Any one of these alone may not have that dramatic an impact but combine two or more and you could find yourself being rejected by lenders:-

  • Ensure you are on the electoral roll;
  • Avoid moving house frequently – the ideal is one address covering the last 3 years;
  • Keep your current bank account clean; by this I mean avoid late charges, going over overdraft limits, ensure you have plenty of credits and debits on a regular basis and that they all get paid;
  • Ensure you have at least one utility bill in your name – there’s a tendency for one adult to take responsibility for all bills in many households but this can work against you so put them in joint names or split them between you;
  • Watch those credit cards and loans – even if you have never missed a payment lots of unsecured debts will adversely affect your applications;
  • Similarly if you have lots of credit cards and aren’t using them cancel a few – lots of available unsecured debt can have the same detrimental affect;
  • NEVER miss a mortgage payment – unless you have a very good reason for this and the evidence to back it up this will certainly result in a declined application;
  • Avoid missing credit card and loan payments – the odd one over several years is unlikely to have that bad an effect but lots of them or a regular habit of missed payments will mean no.

It’s not true that those with large portfolios can’t borrow as many of my clients could testify and given we are extremely busy with everyone from brand new investors through to investors with multimillion pound portfolios I know lenders are still lending and clients are still borrowing!

8)Can investors and landlords expect to feel the effects of the FSA ‘Mortgage Market Review’? The Mortgage Market Review is primarily concerned with residential mortgages but we are seeing lenders be overly cautions for example self cert was only mooted as being targeted by the FSA but in order to pre-empt the FSA hatchet the lenders just withdrew from self cert and there is now no self cert residential mortgages available at all!  There are rumours about banning interest only mortgages and there are many buy to let investors rightly concerned about this but again it is very unlikely to apply to buy to let and more likely we will only see changes in residential lending and already have.  The impact is therefore that lenders pull the plug prematurely and withdraw from problem areas or areas that they see as requiring more effort. Buy to let is certainly one of those areas which is why we are left with so few lenders. And those that are left tightening criteria and reducing lending levels.  But there are some new players too and likely to be more in the coming few years so all is not lost for buy to let; on the contrary I think the future holds great promise.

9) You are very well known for your understanding of property options – what would be your advice to people looking into this strategy for the short to medium term future? Short would be the operative word for me. We will now only do option deal where there is a very defined and relatively short term exit ideally under 12 months.  A perfect example might be a redemption penalty situation; the clients can sell for say £120k which suits you if it were not for a redemption penalty that adds an additional £6,000 to the debt and finishes the deal for you both. This is a perfect example of where I would use an option to seal the deal, let out the property and then complete on the purchase when the redemption penalty expires.  The clients have moved on, there’s a clear and defined exit and they will be motivated to complete on the deal.

Too many lease option deals are being done where debts are involved and often the sellers get sellers remorse once you have taken away the immediate pain. I am aware of many investors who have lost a lot of money on options that they will never get to complete on because the owner has refused to exercise the option. Taking these to court is a waste of time and money.

10) With the increased media attention options have receiving this year – can we expect to see regulation come into play (as with sell and rent back a few years ago)? This is extremely likely and the FSA already have their eye on these.  It’s not going to happen just yet as with sale and rent back it will be when a number of cases are highlighted in the press or to organisations such as Shelter. This is not likely to come about until we see a wave of repossessions when interest rates rise or when house prices go up.  In the former case investors who have taken on properties due to a low rate on the underlying mortgage will find their cashflow stretched and will walk away (as the option legally though not morally allows them to do) leaving the ‘seller’ in the lurch and probably not realising that this could happen.

In the case of house prices most investors are only going to want to exercise the option when house prices have gone up sufficiently to make it worth their while. At this point seller remorse kicks in and the seller realises how much equity they’re giving up. A quick call to citizen’s advice or their solicitor to check on the validity of these agreements or going to ground will prevent many investors being able to exercise their options.

The real concern comes where there are also tenant buyers who may have paid deposits that investors have spent and/or paid higher rents expecting those to be credited towards their home.  I’ve already seen several examples of investors heading towards bankruptcy and tenant buyers being unaware that their money is lost and option worthless.  It is when all this starts to unravel we will see regulatory changes; all too late of course but the fallout has the potential to be huge and to damage the industry further.

11) What is your advice to people who maybe on tracker / variable rates and are concerned about the eventual base rate rise? Assume rates are going to rise! It would be unwise to get comfortable on the current low rates.  Preparation is key; it’s no good when rates rise saying ‘I never saw that coming’!  If that means selling some or even all of your properties then do it! If it also means not buying any more and consolidating them so be it.

12) And – for the highly geared landlord concerned about the slow recovery of house prices – would you be able to provide some potential risk mitigation strategies? There are a number of things landlords can do but they all involve assessing the situation and getting real with yourself – there’s no quick fix once you have decided to bury your head in the sand. Some suggestions include:

  • Getting a job!
  • Expanding your services – manage property deals or refurbishments for other investors;
  • Curb your spending (personal and property) – if that means getting rid of the sports car or downsizing your home so be it;
  • Budget and monitor your expenses like a hawk;
  • Improve cashflow – can you increase your rents? Can you offer added incentives or a new fixed term tenancy? Can you let to LHA tenants (although be careful of the changes next year)?;
  • Manage your properties yourself to reduce management and letting fees;
  • Convert single lets to Houses of Multiple Occupation (HMOs);
  • Remortgage – whilst many people are on low base rate trackers, I’m constantly surprised by how many aren’t. Speak to your mortgage adviser about the current products on offer – you may surprised at how low some of the rates actually are and with LTVs up to 80%, things aren’t as bad as many make out;
  • Refinance – it may be better to pull out some cash as a reserve for tougher times now than not be able to later.  Don’t spend it of course but placed in a decent savings account, it may help you out if times get tough;
  • Insure against rate rises – it’s possible to take out an insurance policy to hedge against rate rises. You simply determine when you want the insurance to kick in and they’ll cover the payments over and above that point. Its nowhere near as expensive as investors believe it to be, for example: to cover £1,000,000 worth of interest only mortgages 2% beyond where they currently are (e.g. current rate 2.5% so insurance will pay anything over 4.5%) will cost just £262 a month;
  • Finally do talk to your lender even if you haven’t missed any payments yet. They don’t want to repossess, especially not in the current market. If they can help they will, and will help you do a portfolio review, determine a strategy going forward and a ‘what if’ should the worst happen.

For mortgage advice and information contact Lisa at lisa@keys-mortgages.com or call 024 7617 0096; please mention PSI.

You can also get updates on new products and services, financing tips and advice at www.twitter.com/keysmortgages and property investor updates and tips at www.twitter.com/lisaorme

The above is for information purposes only; rates can change and may not be applicable at the time of publication. Please consult appropriate professionals and contact us for up to date quotations. Keys (UK) Limited is an Appointed Representative of Julian Harris Mortgages Ltd. Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority in the conduct of mortgage and general insurance business with FSA No. 304155. Your home may be repossessed if you do not keep up repayments on a mortgage or other loan secured on it. Think carefully before securing other debts against your home. Buy to let (pure) and commercial mortgages are not regulated by the FSA.

For full details of our terms, fees and disclosures please go to the Keys Mortgages website at www.keys-mortgages.com

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • MSN Reporter
  • PDF
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

The British Property Federation on the Current Buy to Let Market

October 14th, 2010

As one of the leading and influential bodies on the UK housing market, the British Property Federation has some of the country´s most prominent organisations and institutions as members.  Please see an interview below with spokesman Patrick Clift where we discuss a variety of issues related to the private rented sector including the importance of landlords post-credit crunch; the need of professional standards in the industry; what the BPF are doing to encourage the sector; tax incentives; reforms to the Local Housing Allowance (LHA) system / social housing policy; UK infrastructual improvements and the future role of the organisation.

1) Can you outline the essential role of the British Property Federation (BPF)?  The British Property Federation is a membership organisation devoted to representing the interests of all those involved in property ownership and investment.  We aim to create the conditions in which the property industry can grow and thrive, for the benefit of our members and of the economy as a whole.  BPF have three objectives. Firstly, to raise the profile of the property industry with political stakeholders, the media, and the public. Second, to improve legislative, fiscal and regulatory conditions that affect our industry and so enhance the benefits the industry can bring to the UK. And third, to encourage best practice within the industry as a means of increasing long term value and improving stakeholder perception.

2) Who are some of your main recognised members?  Among our largest and most active members are Allsop, Argent Group, Bank of Scotland Corporate Banking, Big Yellow Group, The British Land Company, Cadogan Estates, CB Richard Ellis, Credit Suisse, Crown Estate, Derwent London, Development Securities, Dorrington, Grainger, Great Portland Estates, Grosvenor, Hammerson, Jones Lang LaSalle, Land Securities Group, Legal & General Property, Lend Lease, Miller Developments, Morgan Stanley, Segro and Westfield Group.

3) How important does the BPF see the role of landlords in the future of the housing industry?  The private rented sector has provided 1.1m additional families with a home since 2000, accounting for nearly all housing growth in that time. However, with almost 5m people languishing on council waiting lists it is clear that more new homes are needed. The private rented sector is vital to delivering flexible tenure for a mobile workforce and providing housing where social renting or home ownership is not applicable or affordable.

4) Do you think that there are enough professional standards within the buy-to-let sector?  The government recently decided against regulation of the private rented sector, and we would agree with ministers that rather than introducing new powers, local authorities have got to show they can better use what already exists.

5) What kind of actions are you taking to encourage the private rented sector?  The BPF has promoted the sector every step of the way – increasing its profile, establishing it as a key sub-sector of the housing market and devising policy solutions to increase investment in it.  The BPF is in dialogue with the department for Communities and Local Government, the Treasury and the Homes and Communities Agency to promote PRS and change policies to help encourage institutional investors.   Earlier this year, as part of the Property Industry Alliance, we produced a joint consultation response with the Council of Mortgage Lenders and the Association of Real Estate Funds into a Treasury consultation into increasing investment in the private rented sector.

6) You have long lobbied for tax incentives – particularly for the institutional investor – what kind of progress has been made?  Disappointingly, the new government has decided not to pursue this. The BPF has long argued that a simple and relatively cheap tax incentive would be to disaggregate stamp duty land tax on the bulk purchase of homes. At present, an investor has to pay SDLT on the total cost of a portfolio, as much as 5%, even if the homes would only have been charged at 1% if bought individually.

7) In terms of the recent changes that were put in place to limit the levels of Local Housing Allowance (LHA) receipts – with the government saying that one of the main reasons is to encourage people to get back into the employment market.  With the economy in the state its in, how realistic do you think this is?  Do you think the problems are going to be exacerbated?  We agree that the housing benefit system is in need of reform. However, the government seems to assume that all claimants are long-term and need incentives to return to work, when in fact many have lost their jobs recently as a result of the last recession. By contrast, we would argue that the welfare system should seek to support a person remaining in their home in the early stages of unemployment because that will greatly assist their ability to quickly find another job.

A major issue will be linking housing benefit rises to CPI, rather RPI at present. Over the past decade rents have risen at about 4.5% per annum. CPI on the other hand, is the explicit focus of the Bank of England Monetary Policy Committee, which has a target to maintain it at 2% per annum.  This will have a devastating effect. The mismatch between 2 and 4.5% will be that the pool of property notionally available to claimants will be constantly being eroded by the diminishing purchasing power of their benefit.

The Chartered Institute of Housing analysed the long term effect of this change for different property sizes. They conclude that in some areas, within two years of the change coming into effect, it is projected that no properties will be available that can be fully paid for with LHA.  The consequences are stark. Either that household will build up rent arrears which consequently might lead to eviction, or they must cut back on income intended for other necessities.

8)Related to this – statistics have proven the country’s ongoing demand for social housing – but how are property buyers attracted to this sector to be encouraged with the government imposing stricter rules (such as the increase in LHA)?  Powers exist to open up social housing for private investment, particularly by pension funds and other institutions, and that is something that we would be keen to explore with government.

9) On a general level – what about the infrastructural development of the UK (roads, city regeneration, transport) – what can investors expect to see in the coming years?  Tax increment financing, an innovative method of funding that the BPF has campaigned for since 2005, was adopted as policy at the Liberal Democrat conference last month. This is fantastic news for the provision of new infrastructure, particularly in areas where new infrastructure is needed for property development to go ahead. TIF allows councils to forward-fund infrastructure through prudential borrowing. The loan is then re-paid through the business rates generated by the development unlocked by the new infrastructure. It is a very elegant solution, and if done property will cost tax-payers nothing.

10) What kinds of plans does the BPF have in the short-medium term future of interest to property investors?  We will continue to lobby for the private rented sector – both for new investment and against the more damaging aspects of housing benefit reform. The BPF will continue to work with government to create a “local” planning system that works, and to promote ways in which central and local government can use public sector assets as a catalyst for regeneration and renewal.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • MSN Reporter
  • PDF
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

Kevin Green (Secret Millionaire) Video Interview

September 29th, 2010

Please see below a video interview with Kevin Green (split into two parts) – debatably one of the UK’s most well known property experts not only due to his appearance in Channel 4’s Secret Millionaire show but also his well-known wealth training programmes and honest, up-front approach to investment. Edward Lane caught up with Kevin and discussed the importance of public promotion as a property investor; the current housing market; his thoughts on the future; consumer affordability levels; his advice for newbies / the risk averse; his own investment strategies; lease options and the recent controversy surrounding their use; buying repossessed property (creating a win-win house sale) as well as his wealth training programme:

As stated in the interview, please head to Kevin Green’s website for more information about his wealth training programmes and various other useful links.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • MSN Reporter
  • PDF
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

Finding Bargains with the UK’s Award Winning Property Portal

August 11th, 2010

With so many housing analysis property portals on the web, it has become difficult to really know which one really isthe best at providing truly impartial information to enable property buyers to make the right decisions. Whilst a relatively new service, Zoopla has   made great strides in its analysis and research methods as well as developing one of the UK’s first online auction platforms. Please see an interview with spokesman Lawrence Hall where we discuss the organisation’s new auction tool as well as the growth of the organisation, property valuation, and the future of buying property amongst other topics.

1) Firstly, can you give us a short explanation of what Zoopla is and how it can serve the needs of UK property investors? Zoopla.co.uk is the UK’s most comprehensive residential property website, focused on empowering users with the data they need to make better-informed property decisions. We combine property listings with market value data, local information and community tools.

2) Our readers would be aware of several online portals – what makes Zoopla particularly unique? Most online property portals are focussed on property ‘search’, helping users find homes currently on the market for sale. Zoopla.co.uk combines that service with property ‘research’ providing free, instant value estimates on every UK home, sold prices going back to 1995, local value data and trends and a number of other tools to help all buyers, including investors, do their homework.

Our recently launched online property auctions (see below), which are held every two weeks, also provide a unique opportunity for investors and are helping to transition the traditional model away from ballrooms to the internet, as investors can now bid from the comfort of their homes.

3) How has Zoopla.co.uk grown and changed since its initial inception? Zoopla.co.uk has grown at a faster rate than any other property website over the past two years since its launch and has become the second most-visited property website in the UK, with almost 5 million visits per month.  We continue to lead the innovation in the online property space and remain focused on making the market more transparent and efficient for all parties concerned. Our mission is, and has always been, to provide the most useful online property resource.

4) How is the site maintained and kept current? We add thousands of new properties to search for and data points to research every single day – our data comes from a variety of sources including estate agents, the government and our users amongst others. Our value estimates are calculated using a proprietary algorithm (formula) that analyses millions of property data points including historic sales, current asking prices and property attribute data which are updated daily. We are constantly adding new features and services to make our service more useful and we recently added new search sort options along with the listings history of any properties listed for sale.

5) Many prominent housing industry commentators have, in recent times, stated that the presence of online agencies and portals is becoming increasingly important. What are your thoughts on this and do you believe that face-to-face contact between agents and buyers/sellers needs to be maintained and never out phased? Agents generally provide a highly valuable service to consumers and we see the agent intermediation of property transactions as an essential part of the process. How agents interact with buyers/sellers has and may continue to change as more and more information is readily available but there is no substitute for the knowledge and expertise of a local agent.  We also see property portals as fulfilling an essential service in the buying process. With 9 out of 10 buyers starting their search online and not wishing to hunt in multiple places to find out what is available, portals continue to be the most effective and efficient place for buyers to search and source of leads for estate agents.

6) With your home values page, can you breakdown your criteria for how you deduce this figure – particularly as it is currently very difficult to find solid house sales due to the current low activity in the market? Our valuation estimates are our assessment of the market value of a home on any given day, using a proprietary algorithm that continuously analyses millions of data points relating to property sales and home characteristics throughout the UK. Our estimates are constantly refined, using the most recent data available and a variety of methodologies, in order to provide the most current information on any home.  More information on our Zoopla estimates can be found here.

7) Can you give our readers some information as to how your auction service works? Our online auctions are transformational and have created a new way for buyers and sellers to transact openly. We hold live, online auctions every two weeks at Zoopla.co.uk/auctions and they run from a Thursday afternoon until the Sunday evening. Prospective buyers are able to view the property details several weeks in advance of the event, arrange viewings with the relevant agents and then place bids online during the event, at the end of which, the successful bidders exchange contracts, all online.

8)How would investors be able to engage in due diligence prior to bidding on the property? Our auctions are no different than traditional property auctions, except that they are online instead of in a ballroom. Since the property asset is not in the ballroom to be inspected in traditional auctions and any inspection and due diligence is conducted prior, the ballroom itself is somewhat obsolete. Investors can visit and inspect the properties in advance and also review any related information on our website including the legal pack and disclosure documents that can be found on the relevant property auction page.

9) How can the risks of buying an auction property online be minimised? Much the same as any other auction, the risks are reduced having done research in advance and understanding the asset you are bidding on. This is one of the advantages of Zoopla.co.uk, which provides access to much of the information necessary to determine fair market value and similar transactions.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • MSN Reporter
  • PDF
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

The Concept of ‘Value Investing’

July 14th, 2010

Value investing has long been a methodology used across a variety of sectors in addition to property; its usage has becoming particularly pertinent over the years as a solid strategy that can be used regardless of how markets are behaving.  We spoke briefly to David Kuo, from the well established investment and finance website The Motley Fool, on a range of topics relating to this wide and fascinating subject:

1) Can you explain who the ‘Motley Fool’ are, and a bit about your history? Sixteen years ago, two brothers, Tom & David Gardner, who believed that private investors could be as good as professional at managing investments if they were given access to the right information, set up The Motley Fool in America. We call ourselves Fools (with a capital “F”) because the Fool or Jester was the only person in Shakespearean times who could tell the truth without risking his life. Our logo is the jester and we have offices in both the US and the UK. We communicate with our visitors through our daily investment articles, weekly podcasts and discussion boards.

2) What exactly is ‘value investing’? Value investing, as far as shares are concerned, means buying shares that are unreasonably cheap. So if you can buy a share that is cheaper than other similar shares, and there is no obvious reason for that cheapness other than perhaps market sentiment, then you may have a share that represents value. It may therefore offer above-average growth prospects. Put another way, if you can buy pound coin for 80p, then that represents value.

3) Can you discuss the history of the concept please? Value investing can be traced back to Benjamin Graham who is regarded as the father of value investing. Graham would trawl through mountains of company accounts comparing the intrinsic value of a company with the market price of the business. The two are not necessarily the same, and when the price is significantly lower than the intrinsic value, Graham would buy the share and wait patiently for the market to recognise the true value. These were known as “cigar butt” companies because they had a few puffs left in them.

4) One of the main principles of value investing – is that you continue regardless of what the market is doing (ie. bullish or bearish) – can you explain this a little further? Markets can be driven as much by sentiment as it can be by value. When investor sentiment is poor, there is a good chance that shares may fall to reflect this even though nothing fundamentally may have changed in the business. This is an example of how value and price are out of sync with each other. This would represent a good opportunity for value investors to investigate further, perhaps buy the share if they are cheap enough and wait for the value to be outed.

5) Is it complicated to apply? With value investing, the cheapness is measured by popular ratios, such as price earnings, price to book, yield, and other factors about the company like the level of its debt. Shares are screened to look for shares whose P/E is two-thirds of the market; the yield is 50% above the market; the shares are below the net book value of the assets and with little or no debt.

6) Can you name some prominent investors / investment companies who are using the concept today – and how? Perhaps the most well known, modern-day exponent of value investing is Warren Buffett. The legendary investor is renowned for his many quotes and perhaps the one that best encapsulates value investing is: Be fearful when the market is greedy and be greedy when the market is fearful.

7) Why has the concept be viewed as some as ‘contrarian’? That is because it flies in the face of herd mentality. We have to remember that financial markets are actually different to other markets that we may be more familiar with. For example, if the price of eggs goes up, people eventually start buying fewer eggs. But in financial markets, at least over the short to medium term, rising prices causes people to buy more, because if people think, I want to ride this tide. Disciplined value investors on the other hand will ignore sentiment and sell once the value in the share has been outed.

8)How important is the concept of ‘value investing’ to your own strategy and those at the ‘Motley Fool’? Value investing is one of many disciplines that also include high-yield investing, growth investing and momentum investing. There is no right or wrong discipline only one that is right for you.

9) Are there any risks / downsides? There is no investing Holy Grail. There are risks associated with any style of investing, for instance, high-yield investing is often perceived as one of the safest. But recent events with the banks and BP has shown that even reliable dividend payers can trim, axe and slash their dividend payouts.

10) What are the the factors to be vigilant of if going for a value based investment strategy? It is vital to build into the value calculations a health margin of safety to ensure that you buy the shares at a sufficiently low price. There is a possibility that the shares could fall further, which is why it is important to cut your losses if that should happen. Warren Buffett once said there are two important rules of investing: The first is do not lose money. The second is never forget rule number one.

11) Today, with a more realistic property market backdrop (where prices are perhaps at a more realistic level than before the onset of the recession), there are more property investors looking apply value-based concepts – how do you think it this can be done specifically for property and land? Property and shares are the only two asset classes that have beaten inflation over the long term. Consequently, there are similarities between the two. If you can buy an asset at a generous discount to its book value, manage to generate a market yield and do so without taking on excessive debt, then you may have found yourself a value property that you can hold until the value is outed. Personally, I would prefer to look at Real Estate Investment Trusts where the market is more liquid.

12) If investors wanted to read more into the concepts – what references would you recommend? The definitive book on value investing is Benjamin Graham and David Dodd’s Security Analysis.  Our resident value investing expert, Stephen Bland, writes a weekly article in which he identifies his value picks, and explains why and how he has chosen them.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • MSN Reporter
  • PDF
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

Interview with The Mortgage Works (TMW)

June 23rd, 2010

Please see an interview with Paul Howard – Head of Intermediary Sales – at The Mortgage Works (TMW), one of the UK’s leading buy-to-let lenders.  Property investors were recently very interested in hearing that TMW were the only mortgage company in the current marketplace to raise their loan to value ratio to 80 percent.  We ask what was their reasoning behind this, particularly as several other prominent lenders have failed to follow suit, as well as looking into their thoughts on the short, medium and long-term; how lender behaviour has / is changing; the new Financial Policy Committee (FPC); the new build phenomenon; Local Housing Allowance lending and more:

1) Can you start by giving a brief history of TMWs’ presence in the UK buy to let market? Sure, the Mortgage Works actually began as the Sun Bank which was a subsidiary of Sun Life Canada (an insurance company).  In the mid 1990s, the company started lending in what was then termed as ‘residential investments’ (the term ‘buy-to-let’ was pretty much non-existent at that time).  The company was subsequently acquired by the Portman Building Society and, in 2002, the name was changed to The Mortgage Works.  In 2007, Portman merged with the Nationwide and the company has been a subsidiary ever since.  Today, we are one of the two largest buy-to-let lenders in the UK (the other being Birmingham Midshires) and are very comfortable in the market place.

2) Many investors were excited to hear that you were the first to offer 80 percent loan to value with a competitive pay rate after an extended period of buy to lenders taking a stricter attitude – what was the rationale behind this and, perhaps more importantly for our readers, is it a sign of things to come? The move to 80 percent loan to value was essentially a direct reflection of how our buy to let lending portfolio has performed throughout the recession.  As a company, we are proud to say that we have historically been prudent lenders and, as a result, coped well in what has been the worst economic downturn since the 1930s.  Additionally, the recent changes in the market place also influenced our decision to decrease down-payment requirements.  When compared to a year ago, the housing market on a general level has seen some improvements – for example, the drops we witnessed in 2008 and 2009 are in no way as severe as they are today.  Additionally, we are of course witnessing a very low bank base rate which has helped manage affordability and kept our delinquency levels low.  So, overall, our business model has remained successful and, consequently, we like buy-to-let and want to increase our presence.  In answer to the second part of your question, I would very much doubt we would be increasing it for a while as we appreciate that – whilst the market is improving – things remain very fragile, particularly from a broader economic perspective.

3) Generally are you lot more confident about the buy-to-let market now? Absolutely, and I think buy-to-let investors should be too.  The main reasons are that properties are much cheaper and are offering more solid returns than what was perhaps becoming the case in the build up to the credit crunch.  For those that already own buy-to-let property, most have seen an improvement in their equity position in the last year and many (such as those on trackers and variable rates) have benefitted from very low mortgage payments.  Furthermore, bringing in factors such as an increase in the amount of people looking to rent as well as lack of supply of housing in the UK – we feel it is certainly an advantage to be in the industry.

4) As the UK enters into a slow recovery period – what do you think will happen in the short/medium term buy-to-let market? Yes, the economy still remains in a relatively vulnerable position and our view is that we will remain in a low rate environment for some time to come (even they do start to rise I think it would be at a slow pace).  However, we also expect to see a continued level of subdued lending. The Council of Mortgage Lenders’ (CML) forecast on the total market size is at £150 billion for this year; last year it was £142 billion, representing a very negligible rise.  Indeed, nobody within the industry is suggesting that next year is going to be any different.  So I believe that buy-let-investors should be expected to see very slow to modest growth due to the fact that banks these days are ever concerned about their own ability to borrow from the money markets and many are also facing securitization issues.  The level of growth that the buy to let industry will witness in the medium term will depend on the willingness of more lenders to come back into the marketplace – at the moment many have the scourge of the recent past weighing over them and view buy-to-let as risky.  It should also be noted that most of what is being said here applies to the overall market and not just buy to let.

5) Continuing on this point and looking back to the onset of the credit crunch a few years ago – do you think, on a general level, that buy to let was taken far too lightly by lenders in general? I would not say in general, more by some.  I think that many practices that were undertaken are now clearly viewed as a mistake which has resulted in more usage of the word ‘toxic’ to describe them – which is a great shame as our experience of them has been everything but toxic.   One example would be the ‘day-one’ remortgage: a process where investors were able to effectively pull out their initial down payment, often with extra cash to spare in a very short space of time – whilst many were able to build their portfolio quickly using this method, when the market changed it meant that banks were exposed due to having large portfolios of clients with very little/no equity.  Another example would be lending to so-called ‘property clubs’, who largely focused on pooling investors funds together to buy over-valued stock only for the market to crash, leaving enormous debt positions and very unfortunate consequences.

6) And going on from that, how has TMW’s underwriting procedure changed since the credit crunch? I don’t think the procedure has changed hugely – as I mentioned above, we have always been relatively careful lenders but it would be fair to say that apart from stricter loan-to-value ratios we are also requiring higher payment calculations as well as placing a particular importance on any applicants credit rating (the criteria of which has also increased slightly and which also applies to existing customers).  Overall, however, we are using the same processes as before with buy-to-let: a professional surveyor will inform what the open market value and realistic medium-long term rental figure is for a property which will enable us to determine the viability of providing the loan – a fairly robust practice followed by most lenders which I would not imagine to change for some time.

7) We wanted to get your thoughts on the recent inception of the Financial Policy Committee (FPC) in relation to the future of the buy to let industry? It’s probably too early to tell but the new body certainly intends to regulate the buy to let market which will certainly affect the way lending procedures are managed across the board – this is going to be a challenge for both lenders and landlords.  For us at TMW, however, such regulation is unlikely to make that much of a difference as we already treat buy to let mortgage / further advance / remortgage and other secured lending applications in exactly the same way as we do with regulated prime applications.  Any mortgage application made through the Nationwide is already subject to the necessary controls of the FSA so we would need to adapt according to the new regulations – yet we do not envisage this as being a significant overhaul of our existing practices.

8)You mentioned new-build property clubs before – the property investment community has, in recent times, noticed a large amount of this stock come back on to the market place – perhaps more realistically priced in light of the market changes.  What are TMWs thoughts on lending on these types of property? We have, for some time, had some concerns about new build apartment blocks in particular – in fact, we stopped lending on them back in December 2004 (although we do lend on new build houses).  As I mentioned above, our reasoning for this was the glut of over-priced properties combined with several unscrupulous investment clubs effectively playing the mortgage system – another reason which eventually fuelled the collapse of the market.  Whilst you are right that this position is passing now, I still don’t think we are at the stage where we are comfortable to lend on them as yet.  I think the majority of buy-to-let lenders would concur due to the fact that it was not too long ago that eye-wateringly large sums of money were lost as a result of going too heavily into this market.  Another concern that is readily apparent is the fact that it remains very difficult, from a surveying perspective, to truly value new build properties due to, firstly, a lack of comparable sold data due to the current low activity in local market places and, secondly, the issue of many developers releasing their stock in batches – thereby changing the valuation dynamics (something that has, for a long time, effected the way we view this type stock).  Readers who are still interested in buying new build should not that there are lenders out there who will work with new-builds, but it is highly likely they would offer a product with a low loan to value and undertake fine-toothed due diligence to ensure that their interest in the asset is protected.

9) What are your views on landlords who house Local Housing Allowance (LHA) tenants? We have no issues with lending to landlords who let to LHA tenants – our position is focused around the property owners ability to maintain the loan and the fact that he/she would have carried out appropriate due diligence upon application (which we would obviously verify during our underwriting procedure).  We will undertake the necessary checks on the landlord and NOT the tenant as it will always be the former who will be looked into if things go wrong (which, in reality, they rarely do).  This is the approach we have adopted for the last 2 years and seems to be working very well.

10) What would be your advice to property investors and landlords to best prepare themselves to obtain a buy to let mortgage? The importance of keeping a spotless credit record cannot be understated, as the merest glitch at the moment can sabotage your entire application (this goes for any buy-to-let application, not just with TMW).  As important is to undertake detailed due diligence – focus on the area (schools, hospitals, shops, banks, chemists  and other local amenities); the specific location; demand / supply; what tenants you are likely to house; earnings; yield comparables; crime statistics; transport links to name a few.  One of the many advantages of the modern times we live in is that most of this information is readily available for free!

11) Lastly, what about remortgaging?  Would you adopt a similar lending policy to how you would a purchase mortgage? Our lending principles with regards to re-mortgaging remain broadly in line with house purchases – the process does often tend to move quicker due to most of the information we need already being in place (such as Assured Shorthold Tenancy agreements and other relevant documentation pertaining to the property).  At the moment, we are seeing that many existing investment property owners are not needing / wishing to re-mortgage so as to maintain the favorable terms they are currently receiving as a result of the low bank base rate.  The fact that it is not financially in their interest to remortgage has had an effect on this side of the market for us – but we expect this to gradually change over time.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • MSN Reporter
  • PDF
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

Finance for Landlords and Property Investors – April 2010 Update

April 14th, 2010

As a regular feature, please see the latest interview with Peter Morgan, IFA and Head Broker with Landlord Finance – the specialist finance company for investment property buyers and owners.  In an ever changing financial landscape, Peter gives some insights into the current UK buy to let market place including some professional predictions for the future and other valuable information.

1) We have heard a lot of news about the UK housing Market improving in the last few months. A recent report by the Halifax has showed that BTL applications are now only 5% below the March 2008 levels. Have you noticed a significant increase in business levels? Are you seeing an improvement in residential applications also? Yes business levels are increasing and enquiries are on the up certainly on the buy to let side of the business. Residential enquiries are also increasing although for remortgages many people are on the SVR (Standard Variable Rate) which, in many cases, is hard to beat.

2) What about the supply of products on the market. Are lenders now opening up their doors to lending again? For residential purchases at 90% we have seen a positive response over the last 3 months and there are a few more lenders and rates have improved, however the lenders still have strict criteria to adhere to, but certainly the supply at 90% LTV has improved.

3) What are the market leading rates on the market for both Buy to Let and Residential? For BTL the rates are very good but they come with hefty arrangement fees, and there are some great tracker rates available on residential – but all depend on the loan to value. best rates are currently 2.99% for BTL Tracker & Fixed, but come with a 3.5% arrangement fee. Residential mortgage from 2.49% Tracker rate with a reasonable fee. (All based on a maxium loan to value of 60%).

4) What about LTV’s. I have noticed there seems to be a lot of good rates at 75% LTV. What about BTL rates at higher LTV’s? Are the days of 85% LTV’s gone or can we expect lenders to gradually increase their lending ratios over the coming months? The maximum LTV is 75% on BTL I don’t envisage an increase to 85% any time soon, but hopefully at some point in the not too distant future – 6-12months. The maximum residential LTV is 90%. Yes all the best rates on residential are reserved at 60 -75% LTV.

5)  What is your view on base rates. Should investors be taking advantage of low base rates and remortgaging now? Would you recommend fixed or variable rates of interest? Obviously the base rates are not going to drop any further so there is only one way in which they can go, however I think this will take a while and any increases will only be gradual. I would suggest that the base rate may rise by a quarter percent by the end of the year- so I would advise a fixed rate on a long term one but these come at a premium.  If a 2 year deal is what you are looking for I would suggest a good tracker rate as it may take a year or so for the tracker deals to reach the current fixed rates. I would advise taking advantage of the low rates now, however many SVR’s are as low if not lower than the deals so unless looking to long term fixed then it may not always be best to remortgage!

6)  Another hot topic is No Money Down finance. What is the financial landscape with NMD at the moment. Are investors still doing NMD deals or has the 6 month rule effectively ended this?Basic answer is no, commercially it is very difficult and lenders will require other security.

7)  What about bridging finance. What sort of rates could you offer if an investor is looking to tie some bridging capital into a deal for six months until they can remortgage or sell? Bridging finance is an expensive way of financing a project- it is not something I get involved with directly but our commercial dept tells me our rates are between 1 – 2 % interest per month, 12-24 % annualised and not recommended if no exit strategy is in place. Usually involve high set up fees too.

8)Could you offer any advice to investors who are sitting on SVR’s and are worried about the impact of increasing interest rates. Do you have any products that could help protect investors against this? There is the odd product where you can go on a tracker that and allow you to switch onto their fixed rates at any time without penalty, but if their SVR is low enough the best advice would be to take advantage of low rate and look to a good fixed rate periodically.

9)  Finally could you give us some predictions about where you see house prices going over the next 12 months or so and the financial climate for the rest of the year? I don’t see a boom as we have had in previous years I see a steady well hopefully steady increase over the next 12 months. Obviously there are so many factors effecting the market and I think that if lenders were a little more aggressive and brought out some 95% LTV’s residential products or 80-85% LTV’s BTL then we may see a bit of a spike in house prices. However I think the lenders are content at the moment to stick to their low risk policies!

The team at Landlord Finance can be contacted directly at support@landlordfinanceltd.com or via their website by clicking here.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • MSN Reporter
  • PDF
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

Sarah Beeney’s Tips for Property Investors

March 18th, 2010

Sarah Beeney’s Tips for Property Investors – Access Video Here

Please click on the link above to see a short interview we were fortunate enough to grab with Sarah Beeney (note you will have to be a free member of the Property Investor Hub which can be done quickly and easily by clicking here). Sarah needs very little introduction and we talk about her plans for 2010; her very successful buying and selling website – Tepilo – and a number of topics related to today’s investment property market.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • MSN Reporter
  • PDF
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon