The use of sandwich lease options has become an increasingly popular strategy for investors who are looking to not only help home owners sell quick, but also assist those who want to get on the ladder (and thereby enabling the investor to make a decent profit in terms of rental income and future capital gains – the so called ‘win-win-win’). Yet, it has also left many scratching their heads with regards to the best way to conduct the transaction as well as the future legal implications for all parties involved. Please see below an interview with Richard Spencer, a commercial lawyer and one of the UK’s thought leaders on effectively making the use of lease options in their various forms:
1) Can you start by giving us a bit of information about your firm and how long you have been dealing with lease options? I am a partner in the Commercial Property team at BPE Solicitors LLP (BPE). BPE is a commercial law firm based in Cheltenham, Gloucestershire and acts for a range of clients including property investors, developers, PLCs and entrepreneurs. I have advised a range of property developers in the use of option agreements for 6 years. I started to offer options to property investors around 18 months ago, as conventional mortgages became more difficult to obtain.
2) Sandwich Lease Options have been very popular in the US and Australia but have only, perhaps in the last few years, become increasingly popular in the UK. What are the fundamental legal aspects that people need to be aware of? Sandwich options involve the use of two option agreements. The vendor grants the first option to the investor. A second option is granted to a tenant buyer, who occupies the property under an assured shorthold tenancy agreement. Many investors have been lead to believe that sandwich options are the holy grail. Personally, I would avoid them. They are complex and difficult to put together, the risks for the tenant buyer are high and there is a much higher chance that the investor’s back-end profit will never materialise. However, some deals may require a sandwich to make the figures stack up. The only way I can think they can possibly work is to ensure that the legal owner grants both options, so that the tenant buyer can later show its lender that the seller has owned the property for over six months and that payments have been made towards the full purchase price and not towards an investor’s profit. The fact that the seller then has to account to the investor for the difference between the two prices, should not (in theory!) affect the tenant buyer’s disclosure to its lender. By granting an option to a tenant buyer the investor is limiting the price he can later sell for. Why not just take a purchase option and rent out the property? At least that way, the investor can retain any capital appreciation for himself.
3) What are the essential documents that need to be in place? An investor taking an option needs the following:
- an option agreement;
- an irrevocable power of attorney for each vendor (although if there is more than one vendor, there needs to be more than one attorney)
- a form RX1 signed by the vendor
An investor may also ask the vendor to sign a Transfer Deed (TR1) in case the vendor later disappears. An investor granting an option to a tenant buyer just needs an option agreement and AST. The use of an irrevocable power of attorney does not guarantee that the investor will be able to sign documents in the name of the vendor. The vendor may later suggest that he was under duress to sign and a court may quash the power. However, it’s worth having one signed as back-up. The best way to complete a sale is to have the vendor sign the Transfer Deed in the traditional way.
Also having a Transfer Deed signed now does not guarantee that this will be capable of registration at the Land Registry. The Land Registry changes the look of the form now and again and if the form changes, an old version will not be registered. Also, on registration the investor’s solicitor needs to show on form AP1 which solicitors acted for the vendor on completion. If no firm acts, the vendor must complete and sign form ID1 and provide a passport style photograph. This form needs to be partially completed by a solicitor who has checked the vendor’s ID and certified the photo to confirm it is a true likeness of the vendor. Form ID1 was introduced to combat property fraud. The simplest solution is for the option agreement to confirm that the investor will pay the seller’s legal fees on completion and also to leave a ‘carrot’ for the seller on completion, to motivate him to instruct a solicitor and complete the sale. Some investors offer a small percentage of any equity or a percentage of the proceeds in excess of a certain sale price. All of this needs to be set out in the option agreement.
4) How can investors ensure that their position is protected when undertaking a sandwich lease options? Are there certain clauses in the contracts that need to be in place in order to be legally binding? The main risks lie with the tenant buyer. The investor should ensure he registers an agreed or unilateral notice to protect his option and also a restriction to stop any further dealings with the property. The tenant buyer will also want to register a notice to protect his option.
5) Are there any circumstances where you would not recommend an investor going ahead with a sandwich option agreement? Many commentators advise investors to avoid any option deal whether the seller already has severe financial difficulties. Also, it is common sense but investors should carry out all of the usual checks on a tenant buyer as they would a normal tenant.
6) Do you have a set option period that you recommend to your clients – or does it depend on the deal? The length of the option depends on the deal. The option period needs to be long enough to allow for the value to increase enough to make a good profit, unless the investor is only interested in cashflow. The period also needs to be long enough to avoid paying any early redemption penalties. An option merely gives certain control over a property. An option is not as good as legal ownership, so an investor should aim to complete the purchase as soon as possible. Whilst the option is in place, plenty can change and cause the deal to fall over.
7) As an investor, can you assign a sandwich option on to another party? An option can be assigned to a third party, so long as the contract expressly permits this. An investor will need a Deed of Assignment to assign the option. Following an assignment, the investor must also give written notice of the assignment to the vendor to ensure that it is effective in law.
8)Do the courts view a tenant buyer differently to any other tenant (should any issues arise – ie, because of the fact they have an interest in the property)? The tenant buyer is a normal tenant under an AST. The option is merely a bonus but, so long as it is set up correctly, the option gives the tenant buyer an interest in the land. The option should clearly state that it may be terminated by the vendor if the tenant breaches the AST or if the AST is lawfully ended. If the option does not allow this, the AST may end but the tenant buyer may continue to have an option to purchase! For this to happen, he would also need to continue to make the monthly option payments.
9) With regards to option credits (ie. rental supplements which will go towards the tenant buyers purchase price) – how should this be managed to keep everything safe for all parties? The safest method for tenant buyers is to ensure that all monthly option payments (as opposed to rent) are held by the investor in a separate bank account and on trust for the tenant buyer. This will need to be documented either in the option agreement or in a separate deed. This method is similar to commercial property landlords who hold rent deposits. As the funds are held on trust, they should not form part of his estate on death or insolvency. However, if the investor goes bust the tenant buyer may need to bring the trust to the attention of the official receiver or trustee in bankruptcy before he takes the money.
Some options also allow further credits or allowances towards the purchase price. For example, in one option I worked on, the investor allowed the tenant buyer a further 70% of the option fees paid, so long as the payments were made on time (up to an agreed maximum). So if the tenant buyer paid £100, the investor allowed a further credit of £70 towards the price. Some caution needs to be exercised here, as lenders may not allow credits to be made in this way, just as the don’t always allow gifted deposits or incentives made by developers. The option should deal with this scenario and allow the tenant buyer the discretion to choose between an allowance or a price reduction.
10) Would you recommend investors taking on a tenant buyer that has been repossessed or made bankrupt in the past? Investors will be better placed than I am to choose tenant buyers. Some multi-millionaires were once bankrupt. The checks needs to show whether the tenant’s income is sufficient to make the payments under the option and the AST. If there are going to be problems, they usually start early in the option period, so investors should grant six month ASTs.
11) How can investors get hold of you Richard? I can be contacted on 01242 248232 or by email at richard.spencer@bpe.co.uk. Our website can be found by clicking here: BPE Solicitors LLP.





